[Techtalk] Gimp etc

[A. Mani]

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Akkana Peck <akkana at shallowsky.com> wrote:
>
> What's to respond to? The unspecified third party doesn't give any
> details. "Codecs are bad. Too few tools." How do you respond to a
> report like that?  "The codecs are great! There are plenty of tools!"
> wouldn't help much.
>
> What did he try to do and what were the actual problems he saw?
> The summary posted there reads like "These open-source tools don't
> work exactly the same way and have the same feature set as the tools
> I'm used to, and I didn't want to figure out a workflow for new
> tools"; and there's really no answer to that.

Exactly.
It seems the report was written by a clueless M$Windows-Mac developer.
We have torn him apart :)

> And without knowing the "requirement for CBT development project",
> who can say whether the open-source tools are adequate?

The requirements are quite fluid. The end product should be compatible
with low cost computing.
So actual use cases would be helpful.


Best

A. Mani


-- 
A. Mani
ASL, CLC,  AMS, CMS
http://www.logicamani.co.cc