[Techtalk] opinions on RBLs, please
kmartin at pyrzqxgl.org
Tue Feb 18 11:18:59 EST 2003
Carla Schroder wrote:
> In my never-ending quest for good spam-fighting tools, I've been pondering
> using RBLs. However I'm concerned about blocking legitimate emails, they seem
> rather cavalier about the possibility. "If your ISP is a spammer, get a
> different ISP." Anyone have experience with them? There won't be any relaying
> issues for my clients, no downstream servers, just how will their own mail
> delivery be affected.
Just as an additional data point: most porn spam is sent from 'owned'
boxes. These are often on dynamic IP addresses, and the people doing it
move from box to box to evade blacklisting. By the time you identify
the source to blacklist it, the spammer will likely have moved on, so
that's a losing battle.
Commercial spam is more likely to have come from a spamhaus; those
places do have fixed address blocks and can be blocked with some
reliability. Unfortunately, the commercial spam is not the most
annoying variety. It's the porn spam that irks people the most, and
it's the hardest to stomp on precisely because of the manner in which
they do business (that is to say, illegally).
More information about the Techtalk