[Techtalk] Libretto 20CTA progress (WAS: Do I even think about upgrading it?)

caitlynmaire at earthlink.net caitlynmaire at earthlink.net
Tue Jul 23 23:18:19 EST 2002


Hi, Telsa, and everyone else,
> 
> He said he cheats :) He has a tool called sysgen which installs
> minimal RH 7.2 setups onto a hard disk: you put the disk into a
> slightly more useful box than the PC110, run 'sysgen', and put
> the disk back into the PC110.

I cheated too, but I didn't need sysgen.  I simply placed the 810MB hard
drive from the Libretto 20CTA into my Libretto 50CT.  I wiped the drive
(yes, everything was backed up) and created a DOS partition.  I
installed the DOS drivers for my Addonics PC98 PCMCIA CD-ROM drive.  I
then rebooted, went to the D: drive (the CD-ROM), CDed to \DOSUTILS, and
ran Red Hat's AUTOBOOT.BAT file.  Red Hat Linux 7.2 installed with no
problems.  

I skipped the X configuration since the chipset is different and did a
custom install to slim things down.  When it all went well I put the
10GB drive back into the 50CT and the 810MB drive back into the 20CTA. 
The 20CTA is now running Red Hat 7.2.  A df shows I slimmed things more
than I needed to as I have 280MB free.  That's a good thing, because RH
7.3 is bigger than 7.2, and I'll now repeat the manual upgrade I did on
my 50CT.  Unfortunately, the 7.3 installer doesn't work on the
Librettos, otherwise I'd have gone with 7.3 in the first place.
> 
> That provides a basic RH 7.2 with X, rvxt and Sylpheed and then he
> adds XFce for a pretty X which doesn't munch the RAM he has(n't)
> got.

All good choices, as we already discussed.  XFce is very comfortable for
anyone who learned in the commercial UNIX world with a CDE desktop.  For
anyone else trying something like this, though, IceWM, Blackbox,
AfterStep, WindowMaker, and FVWM2 are all lightweight enough for
older/smaller hardware.  It's really a matter of preference.
> 
> I asked him about Caity's box and he said a 2.4.18-ac kernel
> (or any kernel with rmap) tends to outperform 2.2 on a low-memory
> box. It uses more memory, but swaps the right stuff out when it's
> under load.

Is the stock Red Hat 2.4.18-5 kernel one of his?  Does it have rmap?

> He's actually written a short guide to Linux and low
> powered boxes, but clearly he hasn't put it up anyway :) 

Does he plan to, or will he permit me to post it?

Please do thank Alan for all his help and encouragement.  So far... so
good.

All the best,
Caity



More information about the Techtalk mailing list