[Techtalk] Re: [Techtalk]chmod help on OO
/dev/null
dev_null at iriXx.org
Sat Aug 10 23:47:52 EST 2002
On Saturday 10 August 2002 23:35, you wrote:
> I get the following with an ls -al in the directory OO was in...
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 6955 Jun 26 07:00 soffice
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 347674 Jun 26 07:00 soffice.bin
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 64 Aug 9 23:40 sofficerc
>
> > the soffice binary permissions probably should look like
> > -rwxr-xr-x
> > but at a guess, i think it must be saying
> > -rwx-r--r--
>
> Both of the things that look like the Soffice executable are what you
> say they should be, so I'm guessing if I understand this right that this
> isn't the problem. Do you know what the sofficerc is and should that
> also have X ability for the user and group?
> -Suzi
that could well be it - sofficerc would be the config file, with
preferences...
it should still be owned by root though...
i think the safest bet is to chmod 4755 soffice and soffice.bin
then it will run as if root was running it - so you'll be able to read the
sofficerc :-)
let us know what happens!
m
--
iriXx
www.iriXx.org
cat /dev/sda1 > /dev/dsp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
copyleft: creativity, technology and freedom?
info at copyleftmedia.org.uk
www.copyleftmedia.org.uk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
pgp key at http://www.iriXx.org/pub_key.asc
More information about the Techtalk
mailing list