[Techtalk] kernel upgrades
Kai MacTane
kmactane at GothPunk.com
Thu Oct 11 11:49:12 EST 2001
At 10/11/01 11:21 AM , Glen Strom wrote:
>On 11 Oct 2001, at 11:00, Kai MacTane wrote:
>
>I have looked [in /etc/lilo.conf], and this is what it says:
>image = /boot/vmlinuz
>label = linux
>root = /dev/hdb1
>initrd = /boot/initrd
>
>image = /boot/vmlinuz.suse
>label = suse
>root = /dev/hdb1
>initrd = /boot/initrd.suse
>optional
>
>Unfortunately, it doesn't tell me what the differences are. I haven't
>found any mention of this in the SuSE docs or on the SuSE
>mailing list.
Well, short of reading the /boot/vmlinuz.suse binary to see what it does,
I'd say the "optional" keyword at the end is a fair indication that Jeff
Dike's supposition:
>A guess would be that suse might be a fairly generic kernel off the SuSE
>media, and linux is a customized kernel built later in the install, when
>it has had a chance to look at your hardware.
is probably a good one. I suspect booting that would give you a somewhat
stripped-down kernel, which might not recognize some your more esoteric
hardware (if you have any esoteric hardware), but would more-or-less run
and be kind of stable.
Does "ls -l /boot/vmlinuz*" show vmlinuz.suse as being noticeably smaller
than vmlinuz (say, from 50 to 80 percent as big)? That would be another
indication in favor of Jeff's theory.
--Kai MacTane
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Then, when they spill the demon seed
Turn and face into the wind.
All along you still believed...
Believed you were immune."
--Thomas Dolby,
"The Flat Earth"
More information about the Techtalk
mailing list