[techtalk] SuSE -> Mandrake?

[Shad Young]

I would have to second that assesment.

Shad

moebius at ip-solutions.net wrote:
> 
> Hey Linda,
>   Just an opinion not really an answer. Why go with Mandrake? Yeah the
> kernel is optimized for Pentium and greater, this is something you could
> do for yourself. It's not to hard and if you have the docs in front of you
> it makes it a little easier.
>   Mandrake, again just my opinion, is the Microsoft of Linux. Yeah they've
> got 'pretty'graphical config utils, but they release products that are
> almost completely broken. Bad sym links, incorrect dep's, services not
> ready to run 'out of the box' etc. Plus their supposed compatibility with
> RH is just that, supposed. I would recomend RH, Debian, Caldera before I
> would Mandrake. Even Slack which is still the hackers linux.
> My $.02.
> Harry

-- 
"Fear is the foundation of obedience." Vladimir Lenin
"Without fanaticism one cannot accomplish anything." Evita Peron
"...in order to punish less often, punish more severely." Napoleon
Bonaparte

************
techtalk at linuxchix.org   http://www.linuxchix.org