[techtalk] SuSE -> Mandrake?

Shad Young shad at review-guru.com
Tue Feb 15 00:01:07 EST 2000

I would have to second that assesment.


moebius at ip-solutions.net wrote:
> Hey Linda,
>   Just an opinion not really an answer. Why go with Mandrake? Yeah the
> kernel is optimized for Pentium and greater, this is something you could
> do for yourself. It's not to hard and if you have the docs in front of you
> it makes it a little easier.
>   Mandrake, again just my opinion, is the Microsoft of Linux. Yeah they've
> got 'pretty'graphical config utils, but they release products that are
> almost completely broken. Bad sym links, incorrect dep's, services not
> ready to run 'out of the box' etc. Plus their supposed compatibility with
> RH is just that, supposed. I would recomend RH, Debian, Caldera before I
> would Mandrake. Even Slack which is still the hackers linux.
> My $.02.
> Harry

"Fear is the foundation of obedience." Vladimir Lenin
"Without fanaticism one cannot accomplish anything." Evita Peron
"...in order to punish less often, punish more severely." Napoleon

techtalk at linuxchix.org   http://www.linuxchix.org

More information about the Techtalk mailing list