[Techtalk] [x-post] Go

Rudy Zijlstra rudy at grumpydevil.homelinux.org
Mon Nov 23 08:29:47 UTC 2009


Op maandag 23-11-2009 om 08:52 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Wim De
Smet:
> Hey,
> 
> Not posting this to list?

accidentally... adding the list back

> 
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Rudy Zijlstra
> <rudy at grumpydevil.homelinux.org> wrote:
> > Op zondag 22-11-2009 om 16:01 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Wim De Smet:
> >> (I'm restricting this post to techtalk, feel free to repost)
> >
> >>
> >> I'm not a big fan of the ':=' style for assignment, but it definitely
> >> looks like a solid language. Unfortunately coming from a java world
> >> I'm much more likely to write something in Scala than Go. I definitely
> >> see this replacing C/C++ for many people though. Not to start a
> >> flamewar but I think there's two languages whose time has come.
> >>
> >
> > Hmmm... This makes me think of COBOL (Completely Obsolete Bad Old
> > Language). It was that in 1983 when i was learning programming. It still
> > is, and is still in widespread use...
> 
> I know people that program in COBOL and in many ways it still is a
> useful language. But I think its popularity has more to do with the
> hardware/software environment it runs on than vice versa. IOW, COBOL
> is still around because the mainframes it was used on are still
> around.

Actually from what i know the mainframes have been replaced many times.
The SW environment is the problem. 

> 
> And also because we suck at big software projects, so replacing
> something that grew organically over so many years gets really hard to
> replace since the replacement projects keep failing badly.
> 
> Anyway, I don't see many people starting new projects in COBOL (I hope
> they're not doing that, anyway) so arguably it's already a dead
> language. I'd be more than happy if that were to happen to, say, C++
> but I think Bjarne Stroustrup would disagree with me. :-)
> 

I am not active in the financial sector, but my understanding is that
COBOL is still actively used. You can still find development on the
language itself, which points to active use and likely new projects as
well. 

I have my own gripes with C and C++ (coming from a Pascal / Ada
background), but i expect them to be around for a very long time. They
clearly have their uses and a lot of code exists. 

Cheers,


Rudy



More information about the Techtalk mailing list