melissa at ginormus.com
Thu Aug 2 22:30:32 UTC 2007
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 03:26:36PM -0700, Cynthia Kiser wrote:
> > Also, if anyone know what this really means:
> > Don't use unix symlinks. Just don't. With a symlink a file/directory
> > "exists" twice, something AFP doesn't allow. There's currently no way
> > this can be resolved, as we either end up with two file/dirs having the
> > same id, or a file having two parents. If you still insist on using
> > them, be aware you're heavily violating the specs. You have been warned...
> > So, will the symlinks just be ignored, or will it cause problems with
> > the symlinks when used on the linux machine? It seems a weird,
> > threatening paragraph, and I'm not sure there is really much affect,
> > other than it just doesn't work when the volume is mounted.
> I don't know what the failure mode would be. From my 30 seconds of
> google-acquired knowledge about netatalk, I would say that old Mac's
> didn't have symlinks, so the appletalk protocol doesn't specify how
> they would be treated. What are you using netatalk to do and that
> might help folks guess what might be problematic.
Symlinks do work with the new netatalk. I don't exactly remember the
issue with the statement above. It may have something to do with how
hfs+ handles files and aliases.
More information about the Techtalk