[Techtalk] Linux on NTFS?

[Mike]

I suggest Reiserfs. I feel it is superior to ext3. I have my lappy using
ext3 and it has to check itself every 21 starts or so and it is annoying and
always seems to happen at inopportune times. 
 Mike 

-----Original Message-----
From: techtalk-bounces at linuxchix.org [mailto:techtalk-bounces at linuxchix.org]
On Behalf Of Kathryn Andersen
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 12:45 AM
To: techtalk at linuxchix.org
Subject: Re: [Techtalk] Linux on NTFS?

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 03:31:25AM +0000, mgmonza at sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
> 
> Hello, listmembers,
> 
> Can Linux be loaded on an NTFS formatted drive?  I'm pretty sure RedHat 
> can't, but I wanted to try Debian anyway.
> 
> This woud be on a dual boot, dual drive box with Windows XP on the smaller

> drive and maybe using some disk space on the larger on.  I'd like to put 
> Linux entirely on the larger one.

Is there any particular reason why you have to keep the whole drive as NTFS?
Can't you just allocate one NTFS partition for MS-Windows XP, and format
the others to be something more Linux-native, like ext3 or ReiserFS?

Kathryn Andersen
-- 
 _--_|\     | Kathryn Andersen	<http://www.katspace.com>
/      \    | 
\_.--.*/    | GenFicCrit mailing list
<http://www.katspace.com/gen_fic_crit/>
      v     | 
------------| Melbourne -> Victoria -> Australia -> Southern Hemisphere
Maranatha!  |	-> Earth -> Sol -> Milky Way Galaxy -> Universe
_______________________________________________
Techtalk mailing list
Techtalk at linuxchix.org
http://linuxchix.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/techtalk