[Techtalk] mutt config issue: copying instead of moving messages
Riccarda Cassini
riccarda.cassini at gmx.de
Tue Aug 17 18:59:12 EST 2004
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 10:23:23PM +1000, Rasjid Wilcox wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 August 2004 09:27, Riccarda Cassini wrote:
> > Just in case anyone should perceive the same need as I did, I'd of
> > course be happy to share further instructions - though, if you want a
> > proper patch (you know, that thing that people send in when they say
> > they're "submitting a patch"), you'll have to tell me how to create
> > it... my local guru just went on vacation ;-)
>
> <soapbox>
>
> If it improves the program <...>
...that's exactly the question ;-) Essentially, I added some feature
which *I* find convenient. But hardcoding that behaviour might not be
to everyone's taste. So, to make a useful patch out of this, I'd
probably have to make it configurable, for example by adding a new
config variable "copy_untag", similar in spirit to the existing
"delete_untag". But for this, I'd of course first have to figure out
how that part works...
Yesterday, I felt a bit lazy and didn't bother, in particular as I
myself can't really think of a reason to turn that feature off, anyway.
But maybe I'll look into this some time soon - even if it's only to get
a chance submitting a patch to some OSS project (and watch how people
react when a female newbie is doing it... - just kidding :-)
Thanks for all the tips on diff'ing and patching!
Riccarda
More information about the Techtalk
mailing list