[Techtalk] closing ports in /etc/services

R. Daneel Olivaw linuxchix at r-daneel.com
Fri Sep 19 03:00:07 EST 2003


Hello,

> > 2. This method is of no security value. Stick to service control (you
> > are able to know which service runs, and which not) and firewalling
> > (you decide which ports can be responded to, whitch not ...).
> 
> I agree with everything except this last part.  There is security value
> in that there is one more step that a cracker has to go through to
> enable whatever.  It also helps if an admin makes an honest but careless
> error in that the service that should be disabled is not.  

Well, I agree for the error case.
A cracker, however, will find no problem in adding an entry to
/etc/services.

> Commenting out lines in /etc/services does not replace a firewall by any
> means, and I agree that the firewall and disabling and/or uninstalling
> unneeded services are the primary means of defense.  However, commenting
> out lines in /etc/services DOES have value.

err, say, it is a way to tighten a bit more an already secured system.

> Regards,
> Caity
> (watching the weather deteriorate as the hurricane approaches)
(good luck with that hurricane ...)

bye,

-- 
R. Daneel Olivaw,
The Robot Inside.


More information about the Techtalk mailing list