[Techtalk] Website Building Program For Dummies (me)
Akkana
akkana at shallowsky.com
Thu Aug 8 09:20:04 EST 2002
(Disclaimer up front: my job is working on mozilla's editor.
I'm not trying to proselytize, just want to clear up a few points.)
Syleniel writes:
> Both Netscape and Mozilla have page editors. I have tried out the Mozilla
> editor (the command is mozilla -edit). I personally don't prefer the Mozilla
> editor for actual publishing, because it assumes that your images are all in
> the same directory as the html file.
Fixed in 1.0 and later -- you can specify an image subdirectory.
Publishing snuck in to 1.0 at the very last minute; later builds (like
the upcoming 1.1 or 1.0.1 builds) will have publishing improvements.
> It also doesn't handle layers well, but
> that's probably not a consideration for a basic web page. :)
A (somewhat controversial) decision was made not to handle layers in
mozilla, because they're not a W3C standard (mozilla's browser won't
display them either, nor do most browsers).
Poppy writes:
> has (Netscape AFAIK has NEVER been able to do tables, and even lists are
> stretching it a little... most of my pages now are done in a combination
> of Netscape and text editor/HTML for the fancy stuff)
? Composer has always done tables, and a lot of work went into table
handling in mozilla (especially selection inside tables). It does lists
too, though 1.0 had some annoying regressions in placing the caret in a
list (better in current builds, but still not as good as they could be.)
As I said, I'm not trying to proselytize, and there are lots of good
editors for editing html. But mozilla is probably at least worth a
try, to see if you like it (and please file bugs -- bugzilla.mozilla.org
-- if you encounter problems!)
...Akkana
More information about the Techtalk
mailing list