[techtalk] Sick of surf and porn addicts

Penguina penguina at cosyn.co.nz
Mon May 28 09:20:17 EST 2001


(I'm taking out the attribution here, because the debate is about the
ideas, not who said them)

> > > > > What I do in private cannot reasonably be held as harassment by anyone: by
> > > >definition, they aren't involved. If anyone is offended by the contents of
> > > >my PC, the only person liable for anything is that person: they are
> > > >criminally liable for unauthorised access to my data.
> > >
> > > I don't agree with this. When there is a problem with a computer, it is my
> > > job to fix it. Which means finding out what the problem is. If, at that
> > > time, i get exposed to porn-related material this offends me. It is
> > > belittleing (right word?) to me as a woman, it is rude and is it obscene.
> > > But my access is not unauthorised.
> >
> > Or if I'm working in the same office and offensive material is on display
> > on someone else's PC, I'm not involved in any "unauthorised access" but I
> > could be the object of harassment dur to the display of such material.
>
> If it's on display (i.e. visible to others), that's another matter; I was
> meaning the contents of the user's home directory or whatever, which is
> private to that individual. Obviously, the level of privacy of each user's
> PC will vary from place to place: I tend to think in terms of individual
> offices/cubicles, where what the user does on the PC is private unless
> they have a visitor.

I don't think that the person who pays the rent on the office space,
financed the PCs and pays for the bandwidth every month would feel
the same way.







More information about the Techtalk mailing list