[techtalk] window manager preference?

[Curious]

My choice is definatly icewm.. I discovered it while looking for lightweight WMs for my low end laptop.. It's very "windowsesq" though it can be themed diffrently.. the default keyboard shortcuts borrow from windows and solaris (ie. alt-tab windows.. and alt-f10 to maximize windows (solaris)).. it's fairly lightweight.. very easy to configure (if your not comfortable with editing textfiles there are gui's like icepref and such)... it has builtin cpuload and network load graphs, mail notifyer and apm indicator.. it can be compiled "lite"  without the icewm-taskbar for use with gnome or kde or just superlite wm...

eep.. being summoned.. just my choice.. fun fun fun,
Curious

On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 04:48:30AM -0400, coldfire wrote:
> i was just curious what the window manager of choice is on this list :) ..
> i'm a die hard windowmaker fan ... but i just installed enlightenment and
> it's not that bad .. a bit resource intensive though .. same for GNOME
> from my experiences.  i think blackbox is next on my list.  haven't used
> that for a while now ..
> 
> abe
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> techtalk mailing list
> techtalk at linuxchix.org
> http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk

-- 
 /"\  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
 \ /   ASCII Ribbon Campaign      curious at curious.org
  X   - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail     http://www.curious.org/
 / \  - NO Word docs in e-mail    "This quote is false." -anon