[techtalk] html editors

[Steve Howes]

Jeff wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 08:38:30AM -0500, Julia Frizzell wrote:
> > At 11:44 PM -0800 3/21/00, Jeff wrote:
> > >On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:27:12PM +0800, dez wrote:
> > > > thanx ..jeff......BTW all yours are cpoming thru as an attachment  which i
> > > > thought was odd...
> > >
> > >Yeah, mine does that on purpose, except it isn't html; it is a PGP
> > >signature.
> >
> > yes, however, ANY attachment is bad form on a mailing list. I REALLY
> > don't like having my attachments folder fill up with Untitled,
> > Untitled 1, Untitled 2, etc.
> >
> > Please, remove the signature.
> 
> Um, no.  I use it to identify myself in my email.  I personally believe
> that we all should be using encryption in email, so we can have some
> form of authentication.  You can get PGPi or GPG (which I will be
> switching to in the next couple of weeks) for free -- PGPi for personal
> use, GPG is GPL'd.
> 

But isn't there a time and place for authentication?
Seems a little OTT for a 'public' mailing list.

> As Rik put it, get a less braindead mail client.  I have actually never
> seen a setup where the attachments all get dumped in their own folder.
> What are you using?
> 
> --
> Jeff
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.12
> GCS/M/>P d-(pu) s+:- a17>? C++(++++) L+++ UL++++@>$ P+ E--- W++@ N+ o? K++ w--- O? M V- PS+ PE(--)@ Y+@ PGP++ t+ 5 X++@ R++@ !tv@ b++ DI++++ D- G e- h! r% y?
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
> 
> My Public Key -- http://24.5.73.229/pubkey.txt
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature

-- 
Steve - Cheltenham, UK
---------
In love and light we are
In darkness we are no less




_______________________________________________
techtalk mailing list
techtalk at linuxchix.org
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk