From tech at futurecourse.com Thu Aug 20 02:49:45 2015 From: tech at futurecourse.com (Terry) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:49:45 -0700 Subject: [Announce] [Linuxchix-announce] IMPORTANT: Mailing List Change Message-ID: <55D54049.1080804@futurecourse.com> This is an all-LinuxChix announcement. This mail will be sent to every public LinuxChix list. All-LinuxChix announcements are only made about major changes to or problems with LinuxChix. ------------------- Recently, LinuxChix system administrators became aware of an issue affecting our members and the mailing lists - DMARC adoption by several major mail providers resulted in bounces to over 65% of our members and disabling of their list subscriptions. We have re-enabled the affected members’ subscriptions but now must put in place a permanent solution. In the next two days, LinuxChix will make configuration changes to all of its mailing lists to resolve the issue and ensure that our mailing lists continue to function for all members. Please see http://www.linuxchix.org/mailing-list-changes.html for full details. The FAQ section answers a number of questions members may have about their particular list subscription address. Testing has been done using the new configuration with a variety of MUAs. For most members, there should be no significant changes. What you may see: 1. In your MUA, some list messages may display the From: header as “Jane Doe via Listname " instead of "Jane Doe ". This only occurs for messages to a list *from* a sender with an address whose domain has a DMARC policy of “reject” or “quarantine”. The largest segment of our membership affected - those with Yahoo addresses. 2. A Reply-To: header will be added to this message containing the member’s address. If a custom Reply-To: header is already present, the sender’s address will be appended. All other senders’ messages will *not* have the From: header munged nor have the sender’s address appended to any custom Reply-To: header. In other words, they’ll display as they do now. If you have an AOL or Compuserve address, please see http://www.linuxchix.org/mailing-list-changes.html#6. We’ve tested reply behavior in several MUAs using the Reply, Reply all and Reply to list options and found that MUA behavior, with the exception of Mutt, was the same as with the current list configuration. Mutt required some changes to .muttrc. We’ve documented the .muttrc changes in the Member DMARC FAQ section. http://www.linuxchix.org/mailing-list-changes.html#11 Please note: If someone has set a custom Reply-To: header *and* posts with an address using a domain that has a DMARC policy of "reject" or "quarantine", the Reply-To: header will be appended with the posting address. In this case, a reply will be directed to both addresses. Please be aware of this. We didn’t test every MUA. If you find an issue with your particular MUA, please let us know by posting a message to Techtalk with the following information: what the issue is, whether you found a fix for it and if so, what the fix was so we can add this to our FAQ. We’re not happy about having to make these changes, but we’re stuck between the proverbial “rock and hard place”. -- LinuxChix Coordinators and System Administrators _______________________________________________ Linuxchix-announce mailing list