[Techtalk] Over-zealous spam filtering (by Raven's ISP?)
Raquel Rice
raquel at thericehouse.net
Sat Sep 21 09:24:14 EST 2002
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 15:51:53 +0100 (BST)
James <jas at spamcop.net> wrote:
>
> All the public blacklist projects provide an email address
> (exempted from the blacklist, for obvious reasons!) where server
> admins can query bans, and ask for a re-test.
>
> Except it isn't sent to those who sent you the spam - it's sent to
> anyone using the same ISP as a spammer!
>
> NO. They are major ISPs, who had a *customer* who spammed you.
> There are literally millions of other users of those ISPs who have
> never spammed anybody in their lives, which is why I was rather
> surprised to get a message saying I was "shitlisted for spamming".
>
> My own ISP, despite appearing on your "shit-list" for spamming, is
> very active in preventing its users from operating open-relays,
> open-proxies, spamming, DoSing etc; fire up a copy of CodeRed or
> NIMDA, and you are immediately shut off.
>
> I'm also a little surprised you don't have any of the major US
> ISPs blocked, when they are rather more spam-tolerant than mine...
>
>
> James.
Why all the fuss over one small-time (sorry, Raven. No offense
intended) mail server? If the mail was DISCARDed rather than
REJECTed, you would never have known. I don't answer the door when
Jehovah Witnesses or Seventh Day Adventists or sales people come
knocking. I try not to allow the same thing to happen with my
email. Why all the fuss? Is it worth upsetting everyone's
(including yourself) day over?
--
Raquel
============================================================
If your efforts are sometimes greeted with indifference, don't lose
heart. The sun puts on a wonderful show at daybreak, yet most of
the people in the audience go on sleeping.
--Ada Teixeira
More information about the Techtalk
mailing list