[techtalk] Re: legal signature

[Lyric .]

I have to agree,  I do technical support for a small softwre company in 
Ontario and I keep seeing these huge long "this doesn't apply to a dmna 
thing here but I'm too lazy to delete it from the bottom of my mesage" 
signature files.

That has to be one of my biggest annoyances when doing email support, that 
and the fact that the people on the other end have a tendency to lie when 
asked to upgrade a device driver.

But anyway, bakc to this sig file, not only is it annoying, but technically, 
if we had to adhere to signatures, this entire string, and every message 
that you've ever posted would have to be removed from the online archives.

Come on, wake up when sending email, and put some thought into it


>Message: 2
>From: "Lillis Long" <lrlongx at nrst.net>
>To: <techtalk at linuxchix.org>
>Subject: RE: [techtalk] (no subject)
>Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 08:07:51 -0800
>charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>I realize that this may not be the appropriate place to ask this question,
>but why would you send out an email with a tag line like this? i mean, if
>the information is really that sensetive then why isnt it encrypted and/or
>at least sent with a pgp signature. It just seems like all your doing is
>harrasing/annoying whoever happens to get the email. Why in the world would
>i even bother with a message like this if it wasnt intended for me? Im not
>going to go through the effort of errasing all copies on my hard drive when
>ii dont eve know who sent it.
>
>Oh well, maybe im just weird, It seems so futile.
>
>Lillis(Sorry if my ranting in unwaranted)
>
>*************                    Confidentiality Notice
>This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer.  It is intended
>exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed.  This
>communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
>confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.  If you are not
>the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
>disseminate this message or any part of it.  If you have received this
>message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
>all copies of the message.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>techtalk mailing list
>techtalk at linuxchix.org
>http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2000 09:59:47 -0800 (PST)
>From: Eric Richard Turner <turnere at cc.wwu.edu>
>To: techtalk at linuxchix.org
>cc: techtalk at linuxchix.org
>Subject: [techtalk] Please use a descriptive subject line
>
>I've noticed that several messages have recently been posted without a
>subject in the subject line.
>
>Please fill in the subject line when posting email to the list. It can be
>hard to follow the course of a discussion when the subject is simply "(no
>subject", especially if there are several of these "(no subject)"
>discussions going on at the same time. ;-)
>
>Regards,
>Eric
>
>--
>My public OpenPGP key can be found at
>http://www.wwu.edu/~turnere/turnere.asc
>
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>_______________________________________________
>techtalk mailing list
>techtalk at linuxchix.org
>http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
>
>
>End of techtalk Digest_______________________________________________
>techtalk mailing list
>techtalk at linuxchix.org
>http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.