[techtalk] Don't blame Ingrid I really wroter that, can't u tell CAPS and mispellingz:)

[Steve Kudlak]

At 12:09 PM 10/18/99 +0100, you wrote:
>Ingrid Schupbach wrote:
>
>> > I don't know if I want to inflict a technical group where people are
>> > looking for CODE and sources, and stuff, with a long discussion about
this.
>> > ALTHOUGH if someone has built a DUAL-BOOT LINUX and still uses MICROSOFT
>> > for OCCASSIONAL THINGS, like running a "Tested, Trusted Tool ONE DOESN'T
>> > WANT TO GIVE UP..." So ANY DETAILED STORIES OF DUAL-BOOT INSTALLATIONS
and
>> > HOW THEY WORKED afterword is FULL GORY DETAIL, well that I would LOVE TO
>> > HEAR.
>
>I have two dual-boot installations. At work Linux shares PC with Win NT.
At home
>I have half my HD dedicated to Win 98 and half for Linux. II have only had
one
>really big issue with a dual-boot system - that is, with Linux/NT, I can
never
>get the time right on Linux, or rather I just have to set the clock with
date -s
>immediately after booting into Linux. I think NT was doing something weird
with
>the clock. I very rarely boot into NT these days, but I still have to do
'date
>-s' if I reboot. I don't know why, I think I've broke it somewhere whilst
trying
>to fix it! If I'd not bothered trying to fix it, no doubt I wouldn't have the
>problem now cos I don't boot into NT. At home, with Win 98, I've had none of
>these problems whatsoever. Linux and Windoze get on very well and don't fight
>over the clock.
>
>HTH,
>
>- Kev
>
>
>************
>techtalk at linuxchix.org   http://www.linuxchix.org
>

So I actually wrote that, with all itz mispeliinngz and OVER USE OF
CAPS...Huh, that is curious. This is what I want to do. So thanks for the
info.

Have fun,
Sends Steve



************
techtalk at linuxchix.org   http://www.linuxchix.org