[prog] Converting definitions into 'on the fly' code...

[Rasjid Wilcox]

On Tuesday 04 May 2004 21:19, Conor Daly wrote:
> This is an interesting one for me but comes with a few caveats.  Well, one
> really; "Large amounts of complexity are to be avoided".

Your subject and the above line would suggest to me that an appropriate 
response is 'Use Python' (or perhaps Perl, Ruby etc), but your sample code is 
in C/C++.  Unfortunately I don't speak either of the latter, so I can't 
really add much more.

Just my $0.02.

Cheers,

Rasjid.

-- 
Rasjid Wilcox
Canberra, Australia (UTC +10 hrs)
http://www.openminddev.net