On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Kingsly John <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:member%2Bindichix@kingsly.net">member+indichix@kingsly.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
+++ Gayathri Swaminathan [2009-01-04 20:03:56]:<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
> After being here slightly over a year and observing activities of this<br>
> community, it appears the following members actively engage in several<br>
> LinuxChix-India's activities:<br>
><br>
> - Aneesha<br>
> - Ankita<br>
> - Archana<br>
> - Barkha<br>
> - Hassath<br>
> - Runa<br>
> - Swati<br>
> - Vidya<br>
<br>
</div>Care to explain how Swati fits in the list above?<br>
<br>
- She's not been on the list for a long time.<br>
- Hasn't bothered to reply or state her case in this thread for the past week.<br>
- Has refused to share control of the domain.<br>
- And has had Atul speak for her that she'll keep renewing the domain forever.<br>
- And has a past history of usurping domains that were paid for by her and<br>
transfered from a community and a registered non-profit society (BLUG) to<br>
some private entity (Linux Bangalore).<br>
<br>
I am curious to your reasoning why such a person deserves to have any kind of<br>
control over the domain.<br>
<br>
Kingsly<br>
<br>
PS: Obviously -1 on the votes.<br>
<font color="#888888"></font></blockquote></div><br>Kingsly,<br><br>The reason I still view Swati as a LinuxChix is when it all started, she helped with the initial infrastructure ( that's what I gather from archives/ past)<br>
<br>I have not had any personal issues with Swati or Atul to cite references as you do repeatedly.<br><br>Having said that the domain owner for a chapter must be a group of women. Recent incidents might have caused some bitterness however the initial founders/supporters still have rightful concerns about this chapter.<br>
<br>My 2 cents.<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Gayathri Swaminathan<br>gpgkey: 3EFB3D39<br>Volunteer, FDP<br>